Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

CLIPPER JUPITER

IMO: 9699505
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 13,506 t
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Stavanger
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Solvang ASA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,477 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

111

Gas carrier (LPG) median 89.3 kg/nm (+24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 42.3 (−60%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,145 t

CO₂ emitted

25,389 t

Distance sailed

73,366 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,639 h

235 days, 64% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 111 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+36%)

49.8Ranks 285 of 355, lowest first124

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 12.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 66% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−28%)

14.4Ranks 136 of 355, lowest first120

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU38%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

947 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CLIPPER JUPITER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CLIPPER JUPITER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLIPPER JUPITER
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−2%	−4%	−47%	+10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+1%	−4%	−15%	+17%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+7%	+10%	−5%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	−5%	+1%	+82%	+31%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	−31%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+6.6 kn	−18%	+67%	+91%	−40%	6.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+7%	+1%	−13%	−20%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Solvang ASA	4,374	13,655	39,493	2,941	13.4	111	25.6	–
2024	Solvang ASA	8,375	26,117	74,346	5,395	13.8	113	23.4	–
2023	not published	9,817	30,609	87,754	6,076	14.4	112	19.9	–
2022	not published	9,703	30,244	92,641	6,607	14.0	105	21.3	–
2021	not published	5,602	17,479	50,963	3,876	13.1	110	16.2	–
2020	not published	8,145	25,389	73,366	5,639	13.0	111	16.9	–
2019	not published	5,174	16,150	38,424	5,984	6.4	135	28.3	–
2018	not published	5,578	17,405	44,276	6,535	6.8	126	35.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Solvang ASA	25.6	35.6	−28%	136 of 355	DNV	B
2024	Solvang ASA	23.4	35.8	−35%	102 of 306	DNV	B
2023	not published	19.9	41.8	−52%	77 of 330	DNV	B
2022	not published	21.3	42.5	−50%	80 of 348	DNV	B
2021	not published	16.2	46.9	−65%	29 of 323	DNV	B
2020	not published	16.9	42.3	−60%	45 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	28.3	45.9	−38%	95 of 331	DNV	B
2018	not published	35.5	53.1	−33%	106 of 297	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.