Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NITAYA NAREE

IMO: 9700031
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 22,542 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WESTERN DURBAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,041 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

75.6

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.13

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+9%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

872 t

CO₂ emitted

2,742 t

Distance sailed

11,533 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,062 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 61.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−25%)

61.0Ranks 394 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 61% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+8%)

4.80Ranks 2,105 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU37%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

725 t

83% of all fuel; 17% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

328 t

12.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NITAYA NAREE
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NITAYA NAREE
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NITAYA NAREE
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	−16%	−22%	+82%	+7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	+1.7 kn	−11%	+4%	−60%	−53%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+0%	−4%	−10%	+103%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−0%	−3%	+22%	−24%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+9%	+8%	+129%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−2%	−9%	+20%	+4%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	1,309	4,089	21,239	1,946	10.9	61.6	8.54	–
2024part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	858	2,693	11,670	998	11.7	73.5	7.95	87%
2024	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	858	2,693	11,670	998	11.7	73.5	7.95	87%
2022	not published	2,402	7,534	29,144	2,916	10.0	82.4	16.9	83%
2021	not published	2,646	8,311	32,240	3,084	10.5	82.1	8.34	75%
2020	not published	2,182	6,867	26,466	2,459	10.8	82.4	11.0	83%
2019	not published	872	2,742	11,533	1,062	10.9	75.6	9.13	83%
2018	not published	743	2,329	9,629	822	11.7	77.2	8.76	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	8.54	7.90	+8%	2,105 of 3,611	ClassNK	B
2024part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2024	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	7.95	8.09	−2%	1,480 of 3,089	ClassNK	–
2022	not published	16.9	8.71	+94%	3,567 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	8.34	8.57	−3%	1,615 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	11.0	8.24	+33%	2,378 of 3,150	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	9.13	8.38	+9%	1,969 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	8.76	8.50	+3%	1,787 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.