Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER

IMO: 9702144
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 115,838 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 115,838 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

308.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+74%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.29

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−49%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

113.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

18,690 t

CO₂ emitted

58,253 t

59,171 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

60,661 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,944 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 308.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+74%)

78.8Ranks 2,016 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−49%)

7.22Ranks 375 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU24%
Into the EU68%
At berth in the EU2%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (31,365 t).

Fuel burned laden

98%

2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.9 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−7%	−13%	−37%	−10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−1%	+2%	+149%	+10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	+5%	+16%	+28%	−0%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−11%	−4%	+36%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	+11%	−8%	−49%	+51%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+4%	+4%	−37%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−2%	−10%	−3%	−22%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	18,690	58,253	60,661	3,944	15.4	308.1	8.29	98%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	32,143	100,150	96,531	5,890	16.4	333.0	9.17	98%
2023	not published	13,027	40,611	38,744	2,428	16.0	336.2	8.36	97%
2022	not published	9,713	30,345	30,260	2,102	14.4	321.0	8.40	95%
2021	not published	7,975	24,966	22,202	1,652	13.4	359.2	8.78	95%
2020	not published	14,041	44,248	43,388	2,667	16.3	323.6	5.80	–
2019	not published	21,606	67,451	69,182	4,266	16.2	312.3	5.06	98%
2018	not published	22,712	70,838	71,119	4,038	17.6	319.4	6.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	8.29	16.30	−49%	375 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	9.17	17.52	−48%	391 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.36	19.40	−57%	270 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.40	19.13	−56%	232 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	8.78	17.90	−51%	228 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.80	17.58	−67%	43 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.06	18.88	−73%	5 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.52	20.22	−68%	26 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.