Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER

IMO: 9702144
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 115,838 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 152,768 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

319

Container median 182 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.52

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−68%)

Average speed

17.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+28%)

Fuel per day at sea

135.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

22,712 t

CO₂ emitted

70,838 t

Distance sailed

71,119 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,038 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 308 kg/nm · median 177 (+74%)

78.8Ranks 2,016 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.3 (+16%)

9.1Faster than 82% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.29 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−49%)

7.22Ranks 375 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU32%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,686 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−7%	−13%	−37%	−10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−1%	+2%	+149%	+10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	+5%	+16%	+28%	−0%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−11%	−4%	+36%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	+11%	−8%	−49%	+51%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+4%	+4%	−37%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	−2%	−10%	−3%	−22%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	18,690	58,253	60,661	3,944	15.4	308	8.29	98%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	32,143	100,150	96,531	5,890	16.4	333	9.17	98%
2023	not published	13,027	40,611	38,744	2,428	16.0	336	8.36	97%
2022	not published	9,713	30,345	30,260	2,102	14.4	321	8.40	95%
2021	not published	7,975	24,966	22,202	1,652	13.4	359	8.78	95%
2020	not published	14,041	44,248	43,388	2,667	16.3	324	5.80	–
2019	not published	21,606	67,451	69,182	4,266	16.2	312	5.06	98%
2018	not published	22,712	70,838	71,119	4,038	17.6	319	6.52	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	8.29	16.3	−49%	375 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	9.17	17.5	−48%	391 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.36	19.4	−57%	270 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	8.40	19.1	−56%	232 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	8.78	17.9	−51%	228 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.80	17.6	−67%	43 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.06	18.9	−73%	5 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.52	20.2	−68%	26 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.