Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE

IMO: 9702156
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 100,829 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 166,460 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

313

Container median 172 kg/nm (+82%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.89

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−66%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+11%)

Fuel per day at sea

116.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,759 t

CO₂ emitted

61,878 t

Distance sailed

63,112 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,070 h

170 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 319 kg/nm · median 177 (+80%)

78.8Ranks 2,064 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 71% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.88 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−39%)

7.22Ranks 559 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU38%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,361 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−0%	−12%	−45%	−8%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+4%	+20%	+182%	+41%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+3.7 kn	−3%	+29%	+56%	−21%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.8 kn	−15%	−32%	−7%	+9%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.9 kn	+20%	+5%	−65%	+51%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−4%	−11%	+12%	−1%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+1%	−5%	−14%	−12%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	15,624	48,759	48,946	3,339	14.7	319	9.88	88%
2024part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	12,742	39,741	36,933	2,239	16.5	345	8.42	98%
2024	CMA CGM SA	28,713	89,535	89,686	5,387	16.6	320	10.7	98%
2023	not published	9,786	30,586	31,804	2,199	14.5	308	7.62	98%
2022	not published	6,489	20,452	20,385	1,879	10.8	318	9.69	93%
2021	not published	8,245	25,764	21,938	1,618	13.6	376	8.92	96%
2020	not published	19,759	61,878	63,112	4,070	15.5	313	5.89	–
2019	not published	18,502	57,790	56,450	3,389	16.7	328	5.97	98%
2018	not published	21,306	66,490	65,825	3,689	17.8	324	6.81	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	9.88	16.3	−39%	559 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	CMA SHIPS SAS	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	10.7	17.5	−39%	499 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.62	19.4	−61%	215 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	9.69	19.1	−49%	296 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	8.92	17.9	−50%	237 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.89	17.6	−66%	56 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.97	18.9	−68%	34 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.81	20.2	−66%	44 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.