Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NAPHA NAREE

IMO: 9703423
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 19,352 t
Flag (estimated): Thailand
Port of registry: Bangkok
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.58 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: WESTERN PARIS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 32,129 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.1

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−24%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.75

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−19%)

Average speed

9.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,159 t

CO₂ emitted

3,638 t

Distance sailed

16,776 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,828 h

76 days, 21% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 71.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−13%)

61.0Ranks 986 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 10.7 (+11%)

8.8Faster than 91% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+46%)

4.80Ranks 2,882 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports35%
From the EU54%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

994 t

86% of all fuel; 14% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

162 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NAPHA NAREE
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NAPHA NAREE
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAPHA NAREE
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+12%	+17%	−76%	+25%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−18%	−4%	+145%	+3%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+11%	+3%	+62%	+6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+6%	+1%	+16%	−3%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+1.8 kn	−4%	+15%	−37%	+29%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.1 kn	−8%	−25%	+95%	−41%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	823	2,564	11,482	968	11.9	71.7	11.5	–
2024part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	2,638	8,243	41,232	3,646	11.3	64.0	7.83	97%
2024	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	3,106	9,707	48,445	4,269	11.3	64.1	9.23	82%
2023	not published	1,547	4,845	19,790	2,045	9.7	78.2	8.97	90%
2022	not published	858	2,672	12,191	1,162	10.5	70.3	8.44	87%
2021	not published	695	2,180	10,511	955	11.0	66.1	8.74	77%
2019	not published	1,159	3,638	16,776	1,828	9.2	69.1	6.75	86%
2018	not published	647	2,024	8,601	760	11.3	75.3	11.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	11.5	7.90	+46%	2,882 of 3,611	ClassNK	B
2024part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	GREAT CIRCLE SHIPPING AGENCY LTD	9.23	8.09	+14%	1,928 of 3,089	ClassNK	B
2023	not published	8.97	8.27	+8%	2,044 of 3,548	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	8.44	8.71	−3%	1,857 of 3,968	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	8.74	8.57	+2%	1,806 of 3,466	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	6.75	8.38	−19%	991 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	11.4	8.50	+34%	2,579 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.