Navalyze · Container · Ship

AKADIMOS

IMO: 9706308
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 68,504 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CMA CGM AMAZON

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,465 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

255

Container median 186 kg/nm (+37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−21%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

98.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,243 t

CO₂ emitted

60,135 t

Distance sailed

75,426 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,705 h

196 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 230 kg/nm · median 177 (+30%)

78.8Ranks 1,475 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 13.3 (+15%)

9.1Faster than 80% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−36%)

7.22Ranks 623 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU43%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,137 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AKADIMOS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AKADIMOS
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AKADIMOS
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−15%	−14%	−85%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+5.3 kn	−3%	+49%	+3,763%	−9%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−6.9 kn	+19%	−30%	−87%	−71%	6.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−8%	−5%	−81%	+195%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	+19%	+27%	+439%	−16%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	+3.0 kn	−16%	+5%	+49%	+52%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	2,405	7,494	10,478	685	15.3	230	10.4	99%
2024part-year	Capital- Executive Ship Management Corp	2,836	8,891	10,941	918	11.9	259	10.6	–
2024	CMA CGM SA	18,977	59,209	70,271	4,665	15.1	270	11.0	84%
2023	not published	505	1,602	1,819	185	9.8	278	12.1	–
2022	not published	3,366	10,513	14,409	862	16.7	234	41.6	–
2021	not published	19,243	60,135	75,426	4,705	16.0	255	14.1	–
2020	not published	3,003	9,381	14,004	928	15.1	214	16.8	–
2018	not published	2,403	7,523	9,426	780	12.1	255	11.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	10.4	16.3	−36%	623 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024part-year	Capital- Executive Ship Management Corp	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	–
2024	CMA CGM SA	11.0	17.5	−37%	523 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.1	19.4	−38%	541 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	–
2022	not published	41.6	19.1	+118%	1,502 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	–
2021	not published	14.1	17.9	−21%	645 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	–
2020	not published	16.8	17.6	−4%	843 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	11.1	20.2	−45%	329 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.