Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA

IMO: 9706889
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 108,870 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 122,991 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

345

Container median 165 kg/nm (+109%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.74

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−55%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

131.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,301 t

CO₂ emitted

53,922 t

Distance sailed

50,163 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,157 h

132 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 324 kg/nm · median 177 (+83%)

78.8Ranks 2,080 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 83% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.30 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 495 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU23%
Into the EU70%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

16,938 t

98% of all fuel; 2% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,165 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	−37%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	+78%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+3.0 kn	−4%	+18%	+35%	−11%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−5%	−5%	+31%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−2.3 kn	+10%	−7%	−53%	+45%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−5%	−15%	+19%	+8%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−12%	−11%	−31%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	18,365	57,368	56,660	3,656	15.5	324	9.30	98%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	30,413	94,825	89,296	5,625	15.9	341	9.10	98%
2023	not published	17,301	53,922	50,163	3,157	15.9	345	8.74	98%
2022	not published	13,348	41,793	37,163	2,883	12.9	359	9.83	93%
2021	not published	10,671	33,400	28,303	2,193	12.9	377	9.12	94%
2020	not published	20,731	64,874	60,235	3,953	15.2	344	6.31	–
2019	not published	18,321	57,130	50,503	2,980	16.9	363	5.86	98%
2018	not published	30,038	93,680	72,695	4,368	16.6	413	8.84	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	9.30	16.3	−43%	495 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	9.10	17.5	−48%	379 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	8.74	19.4	−55%	304 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	9.83	19.1	−49%	310 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	9.12	17.9	−49%	255 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	6.31	17.6	−64%	110 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	5.86	18.9	−69%	23 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.84	20.2	−56%	186 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.