Navalyze · Container · Ship

BRUSSELS EXPRESS

IMO: 9708784
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 103,849 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SAJIR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 110,436 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

280

Container median 182 kg/nm (+54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.93

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−61%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

106.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,665 t

CO₂ emitted

77,043 t

Distance sailed

87,973 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,577 h

232 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 256 kg/nm · median 177 (+44%)

78.8Ranks 1,705 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 87% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−54%)

7.22Ranks 254 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU42%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,664 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BRUSSELS EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BRUSSELS EXPRESS
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BRUSSELS EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+4%	+18%	+16%	+2%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+21%	+25%	−9%	+16%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.6 kn	−14%	−11%	+74%	−1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+10%	−4%	−12%	−19%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−12%	−14%	−19%	+12%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−1%	−3%	−48%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−11%	−14%	+9%	−10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	16,700	50,319	65,302	4,141	15.8	256	7.42	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,784	40,916	56,192	4,026	14.0	245	7.28	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12,500	36,186	61,443	4,554	13.5	203	6.25	–
2022	not published	8,406	25,319	35,374	2,737	12.9	238	6.30	–
2021	not published	8,732	26,573	40,339	2,743	14.7	217	7.75	–
2020	not published	12,327	38,493	49,889	3,328	15.0	247	6.94	–
2019	not published	23,897	74,658	96,153	6,261	15.4	249	7.17	–
2018	not published	24,665	77,043	87,973	5,577	15.8	280	7.93	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.42	16.3	−54%	254 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.28	17.5	−58%	190 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.25	19.4	−68%	84 of 1,899	DNV	B
2022	not published	6.30	19.1	−67%	58 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	7.75	17.9	−57%	176 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	6.94	17.6	−61%	164 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	7.17	18.9	−62%	132 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	7.93	20.2	−61%	131 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.