Navalyze · Container · Ship

SALAHUDDIN

IMO: 9708796
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 102,805 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 93,781 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

276

Container median 174 kg/nm (+58%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.21

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−51%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

28,918 t

CO₂ emitted

90,473 t

Distance sailed

104,748 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,938 h

289 days, 79% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 236 kg/nm · median 177 (+33%)

78.8Ranks 1,539 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 13.3 (+24%)

9.1Faster than 95% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.19 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−56%)

7.22Ranks 219 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU42%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,674 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SALAHUDDIN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SALAHUDDIN
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SALAHUDDIN
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.0 kn	−10%	+2%	+6%	−3%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+13%	+21%	+4%	+21%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−11%	−6%	−6%	−4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−1%	−3%	−1%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−2.4 kn	+7%	−10%	+5%	+2%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−11%	−8%	−48%	−26%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+0%	−1%	+51%	+11%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,997	43,813	59,274	3,596	16.5	236	7.19	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	14,603	45,535	55,661	3,829	14.5	262	7.43	–
2023	not published	12,422	39,231	53,383	3,926	13.6	233	6.16	–
2022	not published	14,966	44,971	57,091	4,438	12.9	262	6.45	–
2021	not published	15,194	47,406	57,669	4,365	13.2	264	6.97	–
2020	not published	13,500	42,609	54,720	3,510	15.6	247	6.82	–
2019	not published	28,918	90,473	104,748	6,938	15.1	276	9.21	–
2018	not published	19,042	59,509	69,273	4,505	15.4	275	8.27	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.19	16.3	−56%	219 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	7.43	17.5	−58%	209 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	6.16	19.4	−68%	74 of 1,899	EnvService	C
2022	not published	6.45	19.1	−66%	78 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.97	17.9	−61%	142 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.82	17.6	−61%	153 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	9.21	18.9	−51%	274 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.27	20.2	−59%	155 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.