Navalyze · Container · Ship

LINAH

IMO: 9708801
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 101,063 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 116,053 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

256

Container median 172 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.94

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−61%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,363 t

CO₂ emitted

54,735 t

Distance sailed

67,959 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,278 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 247 kg/nm · median 177 (+39%)

78.8Ranks 1,623 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 72% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.63 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−53%)

7.22Ranks 287 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU42%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,708 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LINAH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LINAH
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LINAH
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+5%	+12%	+50%	+8%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	+12%	+28%	+24%	+43%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	−19%	−28%	−21%	−32%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+4%	+3%	−6%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.1 kn	−3%	−16%	−15%	−0%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−10%	−5%	−20%	−15%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−1%	−6%	−12%	−3%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	19,725	61,606	79,892	5,434	14.7	247	7.63	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	12,488	38,952	53,205	3,866	13.8	235	7.04	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8,953	22,075	42,886	3,538	12.1	209	4.92	–
2022	not published	13,916	41,719	53,976	3,961	13.6	258	7.28	–
2021	not published	14,343	44,754	57,720	4,187	13.8	249	6.92	–
2020	not published	17,363	54,735	67,959	4,278	15.9	256	6.94	–
2019	not published	24,081	75,292	84,784	5,649	15.0	284	8.16	–
2018	not published	27,553	86,015	96,464	6,046	16.0	286	8.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.63	16.3	−53%	287 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.04	17.5	−60%	156 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	4.92	19.4	−75%	6 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	7.28	19.1	−62%	161 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.92	17.9	−61%	137 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.94	17.6	−61%	164 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	8.16	18.9	−57%	204 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.41	20.2	−58%	165 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.