Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL NEFUD

IMO: 9708813
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 153,949 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 125,054 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

309

Container median 182 kg/nm (+70%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.72

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−62%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

116.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,112 t

CO₂ emitted

53,524 t

Distance sailed

55,441 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,521 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 340 kg/nm · median 177 (+92%)

78.8Ranks 2,131 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 13.3 (+23%)

9.1Faster than 93% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−58%)

7.22Ranks 174 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU43%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,820 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL NEFUD
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL NEFUD
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL NEFUD
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	+14%	+38%	+69%	−7%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	+14%	+5%	+24%	−7%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.6 kn	−9%	+3%	−23%	+17%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+0%	+1%	+2%	+16%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−2.3 kn	−6%	−20%	−32%	−18%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−9%	−3%	−0%	+0%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	+9%	−1%	+8%	−7%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	22,685	70,839	66,688	4,091	16.3	340	6.90	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	11,764	36,777	39,413	2,917	13.5	299	7.41	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8,291	23,463	31,741	2,155	14.7	261	7.97	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11,867	31,254	41,311	3,164	13.1	287	6.80	–
2021	not published	11,605	36,342	40,433	3,119	13.0	287	5.88	–
2020	not published	18,263	57,678	59,847	3,920	15.3	305	7.21	–
2019	not published	20,198	63,140	60,003	4,204	14.3	337	7.18	–
2018	not published	17,112	53,524	55,441	3,521	15.7	309	7.72	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.90	16.3	−58%	174 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.41	17.5	−58%	207 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	7.97	19.4	−59%	249 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.80	19.1	−64%	119 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	5.88	17.9	−67%	45 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	7.21	17.6	−59%	183 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.18	18.9	−62%	134 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.72	20.2	−62%	116 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.