Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL DAHNA EXPRESS

IMO: 9708825
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 146,688 t
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AL DAHNA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 146,688 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

327.9 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+85%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.98

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−57%)

Average speed

16.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

128.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

23,572 t

CO₂ emitted

73,603 t

74,760 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

71,886 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,419 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 327.9 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+85%)

78.8Ranks 2,098 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 13.3 (+23%)

9.1Faster than 93% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−57%)

7.22Ranks 192 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU45%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU2%

48% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (35,102 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

1.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AL DAHNA EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL DAHNA EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL DAHNA EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	+30%	+57%	+37%	+12%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	−0%	+33%	+4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+17%	+24%	−3%	+4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−34%	−37%	+31%	−14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+6%	−4%	−47%	+11%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−3%	+5%	+20%	−22%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+1%	−7%	−21%	−6%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	23,572	73,603	71,886	4,419	16.3	327.9	6.98	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,178	41,017	52,369	3,878	13.5	251.6	6.22	–
2023LNG	not published	9,700	26,225	39,426	2,847	13.8	246.0	6.00	–
2022LNG	not published	8,564	24,983	40,806	3,114	13.1	209.9	5.75	–
2021	not published	9,977	31,232	31,191	2,284	13.7	319.9	6.66	–
2020	not published	17,765	56,137	59,063	3,900	15.1	300.8	6.02	–
2019	not published	15,346	47,952	49,226	3,545	13.9	311.7	7.67	–
2018	not published	19,348	60,473	62,546	4,167	15.0	309.3	8.17	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.98	16.30	−57%	192 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.22	17.52	−64%	85 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG	not published	6.00	19.40	−69%	57 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022LNG	not published	5.75	19.13	−70%	22 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.66	17.90	−63%	114 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.02	17.58	−66%	66 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.67	18.88	−59%	168 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.17	20.22	−60%	148 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.