Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL DAHNA EXPRESS

IMO: 9708825
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 146,688 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AL DAHNA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 127,004 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

312

Container median 174 kg/nm (+79%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.67

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−59%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

103.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,346 t

CO₂ emitted

47,952 t

Distance sailed

49,226 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,545 h

148 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 328 kg/nm · median 177 (+85%)

78.8Ranks 2,098 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 13.3 (+23%)

9.1Faster than 93% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−57%)

7.22Ranks 192 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

796 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL DAHNA EXPRESS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL DAHNA EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL DAHNA EXPRESS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	+30%	+57%	+37%	+12%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	−0%	+33%	+4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+17%	+24%	−3%	+4%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−34%	−37%	+31%	−14%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.4 kn	+6%	−4%	−47%	+11%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−3%	+5%	+20%	−22%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+1%	−7%	−21%	−6%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	23,572	73,603	71,886	4,419	16.3	328	6.98	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,178	41,017	52,369	3,878	13.5	252	6.22	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,700	26,225	39,426	2,847	13.8	246	6.00	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,564	24,983	40,806	3,114	13.1	210	5.75	–
2021	not published	9,977	31,232	31,191	2,284	13.7	320	6.66	–
2020	not published	17,765	56,137	59,063	3,900	15.1	301	6.02	–
2019	not published	15,346	47,952	49,226	3,545	13.9	312	7.67	–
2018	not published	19,348	60,473	62,546	4,167	15.0	309	8.17	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.98	16.3	−57%	192 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.22	17.5	−64%	85 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.00	19.4	−69%	57 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5.75	19.1	−70%	22 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.66	17.9	−63%	114 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.02	17.6	−66%	66 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.67	18.9	−59%	168 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	8.17	20.2	−60%	148 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.