Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL MURABBA

IMO: 9708837
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 109,327 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.28 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HL Crewmanagement GmbH

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 114,747 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

251

Container median 186 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.83

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−62%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,345 t

CO₂ emitted

44,774 t

Distance sailed

57,130 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,021 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 237 kg/nm · median 177 (+34%)

78.8Ranks 1,548 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 87% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.79 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−58%)

7.22Ranks 163 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports16%
From the EU37%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,754 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL MURABBA
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL MURABBA
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL MURABBA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−8%	−5%	+5%	+3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+8%	+19%	+40%	−16%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−7%	−9%	−12%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+13%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.6 kn	+8%	−2%	−5%	+8%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−8%	−3%	−18%	−9%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	+0%	−6%	−17%	−6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	13,408	41,980	56,899	3,658	15.6	236	6.73	–
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	19,656	61,548	82,912	5,253	15.8	237	6.79	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	20,336	63,395	79,174	5,150	15.4	257	6.57	–
2023	not published	13,514	42,157	56,647	4,081	13.9	239	7.82	–
2022	not published	16,523	51,542	64,463	4,544	14.2	256	7.35	–
2021	not published	14,345	44,774	57,130	4,021	14.2	251	6.83	–
2020	not published	13,893	43,806	60,004	3,804	15.8	232	6.30	–
2019	not published	18,277	57,147	72,814	4,849	15.0	251	6.92	–
2018	not published	21,916	68,454	87,670	5,482	16.0	250	7.40	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.79	16.3	−58%	163 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	6.57	17.5	−63%	113 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.82	19.4	−60%	228 of 1,899	EnvService	B+C
2022	not published	7.35	19.1	−62%	173 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.83	17.9	−62%	128 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.30	17.6	−64%	106 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.92	18.9	−63%	111 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.40	20.2	−63%	90 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.