Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL MURAYKH

IMO: 9708863
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 119,037 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 151,955 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

312

Container median 174 kg/nm (+79%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−66%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,006 t

CO₂ emitted

43,848 t

Distance sailed

44,947 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,361 h

140 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 318 kg/nm · median 177 (+80%)

78.8Ranks 2,060 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.5 kn · median 13.3 (+24%)

9.1Faster than 94% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−49%)

7.22Ranks 386 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU42%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,232 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL MURAYKH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL MURAYKH
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL MURAYKH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	+6%	+23%	+35%	+15%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+18%	+28%	+25%	+17%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−14%	−16%	+44%	−7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−7%	−11%	−8%	−8%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	+0%	−9%	−43%	+14%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+2%	+18%	+22%	−2%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.3 kn	+13%	+3%	−21%	−4%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	22,403	69,859	70,368	4,271	16.5	318	8.34	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	15,665	48,681	52,179	3,678	14.2	300	7.23	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10,582	26,687	41,664	3,192	13.1	254	6.18	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8,485	22,593	28,839	2,146	13.4	294	6.63	–
2021	not published	9,934	31,112	31,286	2,226	14.1	318	7.18	–
2020	not published	17,381	54,887	54,823	3,549	15.4	317	6.31	–
2019	not published	14,006	43,848	44,947	3,361	13.4	312	6.42	–
2018	not published	15,622	48,865	56,751	3,873	14.7	275	6.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.34	16.3	−49%	386 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.23	17.5	−59%	184 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.18	19.4	−68%	80 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.63	19.1	−65%	97 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	7.18	17.9	−60%	151 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.31	17.6	−64%	110 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.42	18.9	−66%	63 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	6.69	20.2	−67%	34 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.