Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM CAYENNE

IMO: 9709192
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,935 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,566 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

121

Container median 165 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+44%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,084 t

CO₂ emitted

25,301 t

Distance sailed

66,751 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,779 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 127 kg/nm · median 177 (−28%)

78.8Ranks 755 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.8 kn · median 13.3 (−4%)

9.1Faster than 42% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+90%)

7.22Ranks 1,711 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU37%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

7,583 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,579 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM CAYENNE
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM CAYENNE
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM CAYENNE
Container median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+4%	−5%	−29%	+2%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+9%	+8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−14%	−24%	−22%	−14%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+6%	+6%	+11%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−4%	−7%	−9%	+7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+8%	+9%	−4%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−13%	−10%	+19%	−29%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	6,535	20,591	51,485	4,028	12.8	127	30.9	86%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	8,863	27,762	72,504	5,203	13.9	122	30.3	90%
2023	not published	8,084	25,301	66,751	4,779	14.0	121	27.9	94%
2022	not published	12,050	38,059	85,182	5,448	15.6	142	32.7	87%
2021	not published	10,307	32,521	76,916	4,914	15.7	134	32.2	96%
2020	not published	11,803	37,228	84,824	5,216	16.3	139	30.0	100%
2019	not published	11,391	35,517	88,328	5,463	16.2	129	27.1	96%
2018	not published	11,015	34,351	74,020	4,738	15.6	149	38.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	30.9	16.3	+90%	1,711 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	30.3	17.5	+73%	1,463 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	27.9	19.4	+44%	1,293 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	32.7	19.1	+71%	1,354 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	32.2	17.9	+80%	1,352 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	30.0	17.6	+71%	1,335 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	27.1	18.9	+43%	1,173 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	38.1	20.2	+88%	1,311 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.