Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM MARSEILLE

IMO: 9709207
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 13,623 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,623 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

132.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.48

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+87%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

39.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,422 t

CO₂ emitted

26,347 t

26,761 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

63,453 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,099 h

212 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 132.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−25%)

78.8Ranks 799 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 37% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.48 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+87%)

7.22Ranks 1,694 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU39%
Into the EU44%
At berth in the EU5%

57% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (15,109 t).

Fuel burned laden

95%

5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

5.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM MARSEILLE
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM MARSEILLE
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM MARSEILLE
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	+6%	−6%	−13%	+7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	+1%	+9%	+6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−17%	−22%	−20%	−20%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+12%	+11%	−0%	−1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	+2%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−3%	−1%	−4%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+34%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	8,422	26,347	63,453	5,099	12.4	132.7	30.48	95%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,118	28,510	72,735	5,186	14.0	125.4	28.40	95%
2023	not published	8,182	25,581	66,839	4,690	14.3	122.4	26.70	94%
2022	not published	12,312	38,873	83,110	5,524	15.0	148.1	33.50	96%
2021	not published	11,007	34,733	83,350	5,461	15.3	132.1	33.93	96%
2020	not published	11,391	35,900	81,821	5,425	15.1	139.2	29.49	100%
2019	not published	12,293	38,348	85,528	5,825	14.7	143.7	31.72	96%
2018	not published	8,976	28,004	63,750	4,175	15.3	140.8	34.11	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	30.48	16.30	+87%	1,694 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	28.40	17.52	+62%	1,415 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	26.70	19.40	+38%	1,251 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	33.50	19.13	+75%	1,371 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	33.93	17.90	+90%	1,386 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	29.49	17.58	+68%	1,328 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	31.72	18.88	+68%	1,296 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	34.11	20.22	+69%	1,240 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.