Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM MARSEILLE

IMO: 9709207
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 13,623 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,281 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

132

Container median 186 kg/nm (−29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

33.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+90%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

48.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,007 t

CO₂ emitted

34,733 t

Distance sailed

83,350 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,461 h

228 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 133 kg/nm · median 177 (−25%)

78.8Ranks 799 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 37% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+87%)

7.22Ranks 1,694 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU48%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

10,534 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

764 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM MARSEILLE
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM MARSEILLE
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM MARSEILLE
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	+6%	−6%	−13%	+7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	+1%	+9%	+6%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−17%	−22%	−20%	−20%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+12%	+11%	−0%	−1%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	+2%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−3%	−1%	−4%	−7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+2%	−2%	+34%	−7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	8,422	26,347	63,453	5,099	12.4	133	30.5	95%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,118	28,510	72,735	5,186	14.0	125	28.4	95%
2023	not published	8,182	25,581	66,839	4,690	14.3	122	26.7	94%
2022	not published	12,312	38,873	83,110	5,524	15.0	148	33.5	96%
2021	not published	11,007	34,733	83,350	5,461	15.3	132	33.9	96%
2020	not published	11,391	35,900	81,821	5,425	15.1	139	29.5	100%
2019	not published	12,293	38,348	85,528	5,825	14.7	144	31.7	96%
2018	not published	8,976	28,004	63,750	4,175	15.3	141	34.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	30.5	16.3	+87%	1,694 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	28.4	17.5	+62%	1,415 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	26.7	19.4	+38%	1,251 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	33.5	19.1	+75%	1,371 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	33.9	17.9	+90%	1,386 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	29.5	17.6	+68%	1,328 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	31.7	18.9	+68%	1,296 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	34.1	20.2	+69%	1,240 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.