Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT

IMO: 9709219
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 14,392 t
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,638 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

147

Container median 174 kg/nm (−16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+55%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

56.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,988 t

CO₂ emitted

40,533 t

Distance sailed

88,491 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,529 h

230 days, 63% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 138 kg/nm · median 177 (−22%)

78.8Ranks 837 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+85%)

7.22Ranks 1,687 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU43%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

12,378 t

95% of all fuel; 5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,905 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+8%	+9%	−8%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−0%	−3%	+2%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	−10%	−20%	+3%	−6%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+7%	+7%	−21%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−5%	−4%	+4%	+17%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	−5%	−2%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−2%	−6%	+23%	−19%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,261	29,023	66,996	4,773	14.0	138	30.1	91%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	9,277	29,019	72,456	5,219	13.9	128	29.7	95%
2023	not published	9,146	28,616	71,370	4,982	14.3	128	29.2	94%
2022	not published	9,872	31,181	69,296	4,299	16.1	143	31.2	96%
2021	not published	11,668	36,837	87,441	5,463	16.0	133	33.4	96%
2020	not published	11,800	37,206	83,861	5,326	15.7	141	28.6	100%
2019	not published	12,988	40,533	88,491	5,529	16.0	147	29.3	95%
2018	not published	10,776	33,605	72,002	4,319	16.7	150	36.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	30.1	16.3	+85%	1,687 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	29.7	17.5	+70%	1,449 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	29.2	19.4	+51%	1,333 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	31.2	19.1	+63%	1,318 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	33.4	17.9	+86%	1,373 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	28.6	17.6	+63%	1,312 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	29.3	18.9	+55%	1,244 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	36.2	20.2	+79%	1,275 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.