Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TANYA

IMO: 9722704
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,899 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEDI 10.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,899 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

230.3 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.98

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (−32%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,239 t

CO₂ emitted

10,093 t

10,252 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

14,065 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

895 h

37 days, 10% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 230.3 kg/nm · median 167.2 (+38%)

78.9Ranks 1,340 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 15.7 kn · median 13.5 (+16%)

9.6Faster than 85% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (−32%)

7.33Ranks 602 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU77%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU3%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,542 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM TANYA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TANYA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TANYA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	+5%	+29%	−24%	+9%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−21%	−8%	+227%	−27%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+3%	−12%	+5%	+7%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−3.6 kn	−1%	−22%	−90%	+34%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+5%	+3%	−2%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−7%	−7%	+8%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	3,239	10,093	14,065	895	15.7	230.3	11.98	97%
2023	not published	4,066	12,683	18,536	1,445	12.8	219.3	10.96	92%
2022	not published	1,564	4,951	5,667	512	11.1	276.0	15.02	86%
2021	not published	1,443	4,560	5,381	416	12.9	268.2	14.07	92%
2020	not published	15,086	47,718	55,947	3,399	16.5	269.6	10.49	100%
2019	not published	14,665	46,139	56,948	3,411	16.7	257.5	9.53	96%
2018	not published	14,677	46,057	52,813	3,161	16.7	277.9	12.25	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	11.98	17.52	−32%	602 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	10.96	19.40	−44%	454 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	15.02	19.13	−21%	699 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	14.07	17.90	−21%	638 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	10.49	17.58	−40%	415 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	9.53	18.88	−50%	291 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	12.25	20.22	−39%	397 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.