Navalyze · Container · Ship

BREMERHAVEN EXPRESS

IMO: 9723253
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 74,214 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.04 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HUNGARY

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 84,679 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

237

Container median 172 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.76

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−50%)

Average speed

15.3 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,915 t

CO₂ emitted

49,842 t

Distance sailed

67,192 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,403 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 222 kg/nm · median 177 (+25%)

78.8Ranks 1,418 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 13.3 (+1%)

9.1Faster than 51% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 499 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports32%
From the EU32%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,874 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BREMERHAVEN EXPRESS
Container median

0.0200.0400.0600.0800.01,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BREMERHAVEN EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BREMERHAVEN EXPRESS
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−13%	−19%	+9%	−5%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	+23%	+48%	+27%	−9%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−11%	−15%	−11%	+13%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	−6%	−19%	+16%	+3%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+4%	−0%	−46%	+5%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+3%	+7%	+39%	−13%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+4.5 kn	−73%	−61%	+223%	−82%	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 73%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	11,456	35,778	51,616	3,852	13.4	222	9.34	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	12,070	37,834	47,398	3,290	14.4	255	9.87	–
2023	not published	7,680	24,174	37,180	3,103	12.0	207	10.8	–
2022	not published	9,740	30,803	41,868	3,344	12.5	233	9.54	–
2021	not published	8,872	28,100	36,025	2,459	14.7	246	9.24	–
2020	not published	15,915	49,842	67,192	4,403	15.3	237	8.76	–
2019	not published	11,126	34,912	48,465	3,304	14.7	230	10.0	–
2018	not published	12,709	39,603	15,018	1,478	10.2	846	56.5	70%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9.34	16.3	−43%	499 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9.87	17.5	−44%	442 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	10.8	19.4	−44%	444 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	9.54	19.1	−50%	290 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	9.24	17.9	−48%	267 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	8.76	17.6	−50%	284 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	10.0	18.9	−47%	324 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	56.5	20.2	+179%	1,550 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.