Navalyze

Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

ECO ALNIC

IMO
9728485
Type
General cargo ship
Average cargo carried
16,877 t
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 5.26 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
AFRICAN GOSHAWK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Dockendale Ship Management FZCO

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,877 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
54.9 kg/nm
Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−34%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.20
g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+29%)
Average speed
11.1 kn
Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+4%)
Fuel per day at sea
14.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
873 t
CO₂ emitted
2,734 t
2,777 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
15,884 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,425 h
59 days, 16% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 54.9 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−34%)
61.0Ranks 159 of 3,610, lowest first114.1
Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 10.7 (+4%)
8.8Faster than 71% of bulk carrier ships11.8
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.20 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+29%)
4.80Ranks 2,617 of 3,610, lowest first15.93
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports6%
  • From the EU23%
  • Into the EU68%
  • At berth in the EU3%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden
91%
9% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
2.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ECO ALNIC
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • ECO ALNIC
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • ECO ALNIC
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2025−0.3 kn−21%−22%−2%+4%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022+1.8 kn+1%+20%+138%+33%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.4 kn+20%+5%−44%–1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-yearDockendale Ship Management FZCO8732,73415,8841,42511.154.910.2091%
2025BRAVE MARITIME INC.8732,73415,8841,42511.154.910.2091%
2022not published1,1273,55716,2581,43011.469.3–68%
2019not published4701,4806,8357129.668.78.2486%
2018not published6972,17212,1531,10611.057.45.96100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmBulk carrier medianvs Bulk carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearDockendale Ship Management FZCO––––ABSA
2025BRAVE MARITIME INC.10.207.89+29%2,617 of 3,610DNVB+C
2022not published9.8321.57−54%128 of 1,034ABSA
2019not published7.3924.96−70%23 of 1,154ABSA+B+C
2018not published––––ABSA+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.