Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL

IMO: 9729128
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,203 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.60 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,962 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

283

Container median 172 kg/nm (+64%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−35%)

Average speed

16.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

111.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,484 t

CO₂ emitted

48,815 t

Distance sailed

54,733 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,327 h

139 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 250 kg/nm · median 177 (+41%)

78.8Ranks 1,652 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 13.3 (−15%)

9.1Faster than 24% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−8%)

7.22Ranks 1,011 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU39%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

15,484 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,777 t

3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−3%	−13%	+50%	−16%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−3%	+18%	+36%	+42%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−4.0 kn	−4%	−31%	−81%	+12%	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	−8%	−22%	−64%	−15%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+6%	+10%	−19%	+15%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+9%	+9%	+17%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	1,512	4,732	6,047	536	11.3	250	15.0	89%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	1,043	3,271	4,038	322	12.5	258	17.8	87%
2023	not published	786	2,456	2,960	285	10.4	266	12.5	84%
2022	not published	4,365	13,773	15,796	1,094	14.4	276	11.2	91%
2021	not published	13,336	42,020	44,268	2,601	17.0	301	13.2	96%
2020	not published	15,484	48,815	54,733	3,327	16.4	283	11.4	100%
2019	not published	12,098	37,873	46,781	2,827	16.5	259	10.2	95%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	15.0	16.3	−8%	1,011 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	17.8	17.5	+1%	997 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	12.5	19.4	−35%	572 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.2	19.1	−41%	423 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	13.2	17.9	−26%	563 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.4	17.6	−35%	469 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	10.2	18.9	−46%	338 of 1,788	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.