Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL DHAIL

IMO: 9732307
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 95,403 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.36 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 101,997 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

259

Container median 182 kg/nm (+42%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.93

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−61%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

97.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,803 t

CO₂ emitted

77,497 t

Distance sailed

95,812 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,085 h

254 days, 69% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 261 kg/nm · median 177 (+48%)

78.8Ranks 1,742 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 70% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−48%)

7.22Ranks 408 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU36%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,565 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL DHAIL
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL DHAIL
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL DHAIL
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+2%	−3%	−66%	+23%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	−1%	+14%	+47%	−4%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+5%	−1%	+96%	+5%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−4%	−6%	+101%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	+13%	+3%	−78%	+9%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	+2%	+9%	−9%	−7%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−13%	−20%	−25%	−14%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7,200	22,445	27,581	1,892	14.6	261	8.53	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	21,070	65,686	81,960	5,374	15.3	257	6.96	–
2023	not published	14,572	45,786	55,880	4,221	13.2	261	7.22	–
2022	not published	7,064	22,043	28,459	2,023	14.1	248	6.89	–
2021	not published	3,659	11,425	14,140	991	14.3	259	6.89	–
2020	not published	14,944	47,188	65,284	4,174	15.6	229	6.31	–
2019	not published	16,117	50,416	71,544	4,917	14.6	225	6.80	–
2018	not published	24,803	77,497	95,812	6,085	15.7	259	7.93	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.53	16.3	−48%	408 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	6.96	17.5	−60%	146 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.22	19.4	−63%	179 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	6.89	19.1	−64%	130 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.89	17.9	−62%	135 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.31	17.6	−64%	110 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.80	18.9	−64%	102 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.93	20.2	−61%	131 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.