Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL MASHRAB

IMO: 9732319
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 96,532 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 116,618 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

247

Container median 186 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.59

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−63%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

73.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,548 t

CO₂ emitted

32,886 t

Distance sailed

42,791 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,445 h

144 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 253 kg/nm · median 177 (+43%)

78.8Ranks 1,685 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 367 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU39%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,815 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL MASHRAB
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL MASHRAB
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL MASHRAB
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+9%	+17%	+7%	+31%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+6%	+12%	+49%	−1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−10%	−5%	+8%	−13%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.9 kn	−1%	+6%	+22%	+10%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.5 kn	+7%	−17%	−16%	+8%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+1%	+5%	−39%	−7%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−6%	−8%	+7%	−6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	22,779	71,281	89,941	5,628	16.0	253	8.21	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	19,422	60,539	83,817	5,598	15.0	232	6.27	–
2023	not published	12,382	39,054	56,405	3,992	14.1	220	6.36	–
2022	not published	12,703	39,673	52,141	3,906	13.3	244	7.28	–
2021	not published	10,548	32,886	42,791	3,445	12.4	247	6.59	–
2020	not published	11,743	37,065	50,815	3,194	15.9	231	6.10	–
2019	not published	19,080	59,630	82,980	5,439	15.3	230	6.59	–
2018	not published	18,967	59,209	77,911	4,970	15.7	243	7.00	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.21	16.3	−50%	367 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	6.27	17.5	−64%	91 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	6.36	19.4	−67%	95 of 1,899	EnvService	B+C
2022	not published	7.28	19.1	−62%	161 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.59	17.9	−63%	110 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	6.10	17.6	−65%	77 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.59	18.9	−65%	86 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.00	20.2	−65%	56 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.