Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL JASRAH

IMO: 9732321
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 101,355 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 114,364 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

247

Container median 186 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.73

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−62%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,222 t

CO₂ emitted

38,133 t

Distance sailed

49,544 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,023 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 258 kg/nm · median 177 (+46%)

78.8Ranks 1,720 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 88% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.97 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−51%)

7.22Ranks 329 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU35%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,701 t

4.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL JASRAH
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL JASRAH
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL JASRAH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	+2%	+6%	+20%	+18%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+11%	+30%	+49%	−7%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.5 kn	+0%	−16%	+0%	+13%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.2 kn	−8%	+16%	+5%	−5%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.1 kn	+0%	−20%	−33%	+4%	3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+4%	+10%	−10%	−67%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−2%	−7%	−14%	+156%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	24,123	75,525	93,494	5,891	15.9	258	7.97	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	19,579	61,025	77,607	5,069	15.3	252	6.75	–
2023	not published	11,859	37,005	52,018	3,994	13.0	228	7.25	–
2022	not published	11,835	36,940	51,911	3,350	15.5	228	6.40	–
2021	not published	12,222	38,133	49,544	4,023	12.3	247	6.73	–
2020	not published	18,279	57,627	74,281	4,810	15.4	246	6.45	–
2019	not published	19,571	61,240	82,626	5,674	14.6	237	19.5	–
2018	not published	23,343	72,918	96,227	6,324	15.2	243	7.60	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.97	16.3	−51%	329 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	6.75	17.5	−61%	134 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	7.25	19.4	−63%	182 of 1,899	EnvService	C
2022	not published	6.40	19.1	−67%	75 of 1,825	EnvService	C
2021	not published	6.73	17.9	−62%	121 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.45	17.6	−63%	124 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	19.5	18.9	+3%	933 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.60	20.2	−62%	107 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.