Navalyze · Container · Ship

AFIF

IMO: 9732345
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 100,788 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.38 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 101,494 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

217

Container median 165 kg/nm (+31%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.29

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−68%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

64.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,459 t

CO₂ emitted

36,738 t

Distance sailed

57,546 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,662 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 261 kg/nm · median 177 (+47%)

78.8Ranks 1,740 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.3 (+11%)

9.1Faster than 72% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.07 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 342 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU36%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,138 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AFIF
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AFIF
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AFIF
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+2%	+3%	+16%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	+18%	+39%	+12%	+10%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−11%	−16%	+19%	−9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−2%	+3%	+40%	+1%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.2 kn	+10%	−12%	−53%	+9%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+3%	+8%	−13%	+3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−7%	−12%	−21%	−12%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	19,514	60,926	74,907	5,098	14.7	261	8.07	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	16,487	51,346	64,724	4,453	14.5	255	6.92	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	12,459	36,738	57,546	4,662	12.3	217	6.29	–
2022	not published	11,789	35,391	48,403	3,728	13.0	244	6.94	–
2021	not published	8,587	26,838	34,655	2,788	12.4	248	6.88	–
2020	not published	16,464	51,949	73,333	4,715	15.6	225	6.30	–
2019	not published	18,255	57,116	84,013	5,656	14.9	217	6.14	–
2018	not published	24,814	77,535	105,796	6,759	15.7	235	6.94	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.07	16.3	−50%	342 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	6.92	17.5	−61%	142 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.29	19.4	−68%	89 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.94	19.1	−64%	131 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.88	17.9	−62%	134 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.30	17.6	−64%	106 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.14	18.9	−67%	50 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	6.94	20.2	−66%	55 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.