Navalyze · Container · Ship

AL JMELIYAH

IMO: 9732357
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 82,075 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 104,634 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

229

Container median 165 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.45

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−67%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+8%)

Fuel per day at sea

78.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,898 t

CO₂ emitted

26,180 t

Distance sailed

38,792 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,728 h

114 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 241 kg/nm · median 177 (+36%)

78.8Ranks 1,574 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 83% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.22 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−43%)

7.22Ranks 484 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU42%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

725 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL JMELIYAH
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL JMELIYAH
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AL JMELIYAH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	+3%	+13%	−8%	+30%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	+52%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+3.2 kn	−11%	+15%	+226%	+2%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.2 kn	+16%	−4%	−64%	−28%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−2.5 kn	+6%	−11%	−45%	+53%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−5%	+1%	−19%	−11%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−9%	−15%	−13%	−3%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,132	41,198	54,442	3,512	15.5	241	9.22	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	13,768	42,769	59,048	4,177	14.1	233	7.07	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8,898	26,180	38,792	2,728	14.2	229	6.45	–
2022	not published	3,071	9,646	11,901	1,083	11.0	258	6.33	–
2021	not published	7,399	23,123	33,160	2,515	13.2	223	8.82	–
2020	not published	12,741	40,208	60,568	3,865	15.7	210	5.78	–
2019	not published	16,473	51,504	74,359	5,068	14.7	222	6.49	–
2018	not published	20,644	64,514	85,200	5,383	15.8	242	6.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	9.22	16.3	−43%	484 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.07	17.5	−60%	160 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	6.45	19.4	−67%	103 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	6.33	19.1	−67%	62 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	8.82	17.9	−51%	232 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	5.78	17.6	−67%	40 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	6.49	18.9	−66%	77 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	6.69	20.2	−67%	34 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.