Navalyze · Container · Ship

TIHAMA

IMO: 9736107
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 140,166 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 149,064 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

334

Container median 174 kg/nm (+92%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.01

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−63%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,370 t

CO₂ emitted

63,694 t

Distance sailed

60,955 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,228 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 336 kg/nm · median 177 (+90%)

78.8Ranks 2,122 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.47 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−54%)

7.22Ranks 258 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU40%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,911 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

TIHAMA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

TIHAMA
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

TIHAMA
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.8 kn	+28%	+55%	+113%	−9%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.1 kn	+1%	−7%	+7%	+50%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	+50%	+70%	+14%	+36%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 50%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−42%	−38%	−17%	−39%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 42%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−4.2 kn	−5%	−30%	−48%	+7%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−6%	+4%	+23%	−12%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+9%	+3%	−7%	−5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	28,204	87,951	84,000	5,250	16.0	336	7.47	–
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	10,341	32,318	39,366	2,992	13.2	263	8.23	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,573	24,215	36,683	2,565	14.3	261	5.49	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,582	15,691	32,115	2,542	12.6	174	4.03	–
2021	not published	11,600	36,301	38,909	3,275	11.9	298	6.58	–
2020	not published	23,564	74,414	75,187	4,684	16.1	313	6.15	–
2019	not published	20,370	63,694	60,955	4,228	14.4	334	7.01	–
2018	not published	20,131	62,948	65,451	4,318	15.2	308	7.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	7.47	16.3	−54%	258 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Hapag-Lloyd AG	8.23	17.5	−53%	294 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5.49	19.4	−72%	21 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	4.03	19.1	−79%	4 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	6.58	17.9	−63%	109 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	6.15	17.6	−65%	84 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	7.01	18.9	−63%	118 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	7.41	20.2	−63%	92 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.