Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SEA TRADER

IMO: 9742077
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,874 t
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CONDOR TRADER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,874 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

64.5 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.32

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−25%)

Average speed

11.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,276 t

CO₂ emitted

3,998 t

4,061 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,760 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,745 h

73 days, 20% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 64.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−19%)

52.8Ranks 368 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−25%)

7.93Ranks 441 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU31%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU3%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

90%

10% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SEA TRADER
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEA TRADER
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEA TRADER
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+3.9 kn	−22%	+19%	+29%	−32%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.8 kn	+36%	−10%	−55%	+19%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−27%	−9%	+303%	−51%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	+22%	+1%	+6%	+102%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−1.6 kn	+18%	+2%	+64%	+37%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,276	3,998	19,760	1,745	11.3	64.5	11.32	90%
2025	ES Maritime Co Ltd	1,276	3,998	19,760	1,745	11.3	64.5	11.32	90%
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,261	3,932	15,285	2,059	7.4	82.5	16.59	81%
2023	not published	2,068	6,457	34,137	3,054	11.2	60.6	13.91	84%
2022	not published	702	2,225	8,474	941	9.0	82.8	28.63	43%
2021	not published	540	1,686	7,963	727	11.0	67.8	14.20	77%
2019	not published	279	874	4,869	385	12.6	57.3	10.38	89%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C
2025	ES Maritime Co Ltd	11.32	15.04	−25%	441 of 1,460	Korean Register	A
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	16.59	16.73	−1%	631 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	13.91	16.23	−14%	514 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	28.63	16.06	+78%	1,106 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	14.20	16.69	−15%	504 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	10.38	17.32	−40%	206 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.