Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Victoria Ship Managementyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Victoria Ship Management | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 53 |
| CO₂ emitted | 143 kt−10.3% |
| Fuel per mile | 72 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.3 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.5% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Bulk carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Victoria Ship Management7.6 (−4% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Ship Management | 36 | 7.6 | −4% | 70 | 10.9 | 1,638 | 6.1% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Victoria Ship Management18.6 (+24% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Ship Management | 17 | 18.6 | +24% | 75 | 7.8 | 2,702 | 4.8% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Ship Management | Bureau Veritas (53) | 0% | 8% | 100% | 0% |
Victoria Ship Management: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVA BERGEN | 9800013 | Chemical tanker | 36.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +70% | 3.9 | 4,697 t | €156k |
| ACTION TRADER | 9808663 | Bulk carrier | 12.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +29% | 9.9 | 3,781 t | €136k |
| EVA HONGKONG | 9800001 | Chemical tanker | 27.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +29% | 6.7 | 3,153 t | €99k |
| COPENHAGEN BULKER | 9831490 | Bulk carrier | 8.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | +6% | 10.2 | 6,265 t | €183k |
| EVA TOKYO | 9865520 | Chemical tanker | 21.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | 0% | 7.2 | 5,450 t | €179k |
| BRIGHTEN TRADER | 9771482 | Bulk carrier | 7.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | 0% | 10.8 | 6,525 t | €191k |
| EVA FUKUOKA | 9989182 | Chemical tanker | 20.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −3% | 8.1 | 3,107 t | €101k |
| EVA TRUST | 9986037 | Chemical tanker | 20.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −3% | 8.1 | 5,871 t | €191k |
| EVA HANSA | 9985980 | Chemical tanker | 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −4% | 8.4 | 7,599 t | €232k |
| EVA USUKI | 9865532 | Chemical tanker | 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −4% | 7.1 | 3,515 t | €93k |
| NORD SANTIAGO | 9831488 | Bulk carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −4% | 10.0 | 3,533 t | €106k |
| LINDEN TRADER | 9867578 | Bulk carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −4% | 11.5 | 4,039 t | €125k |
| OSHIMA JAPAN | 9872975 | Bulk carrier | 7.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −5% | 11.2 | 6,513 t | €214k |
| EVA MANILA | 9918602 | Chemical tanker | 19.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −7% | 8.3 | 5,528 t | €200k |
| BRISTOL TRADER | 9737101 | Chemical tanker | 13.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | −10% | 10.5 | 2,195 t | €59k |
| ASPEN TRADER | 9989302 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −11% | 11.3 | 2,279 t | €62k |
| EPSON TRADER | 9872963 | Bulk carrier | 5.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 6.6 | −11% | 11.1 | 2,650 t | €92k |
| BAI IZMIR | 9855410 | Bulk carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −11% | 10.1 | 4,545 t | €125k |
| WESTERN DONCASTER | 9831505 | Bulk carrier | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −12% | 10.1 | 2,344 t | €77k |
| HAMBURG TEAM | 9855460 | Bulk carrier | 12.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | −17% | 11.1 | 4,859 t | €144k |
| NY SUNRISE | 9934814 | Bulk carrier | 6.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −18% | 10.9 | 2,683 t | €82k |
| VARI TRADER | 9800025 | Chemical tanker | 17.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −19% | 9.8 | 9,228 t | €284k |
| POSEIDON TRADER | 9989326 | Bulk carrier | 7.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −20% | 11.6 | 6,835 t | €197k |
| WESTERN STABAEK | 9989273 | Bulk carrier | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −22% | 10.7 | 1,542 t | €45k |
| DOLPHIN TRADER | 9989285 | Bulk carrier | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −22% | 11.5 | 900 t | €25k |
| EVA RICHWAY | 9986025 | Chemical tanker | 16.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −24% | 7.7 | 4,857 t | €195k |
| UNION TRADER | 9989314 | Bulk carrier | 6.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 8.0 | −24% | 11.5 | 2,498 t | €77k |
| HORIZON TRADER | 1014319 | Bulk carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −25% | 11.8 | 4,434 t | €121k |
| APOLLON TRADER | 9989364 | Bulk carrier | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −28% | 10.8 | 4,250 t | €143k |
| EVA FUJI | 9914242 | Chemical tanker | 14.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | −31% | 9.1 | 4,150 t | €148k |
30 of 53 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.