Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SEA TRADER

IMO: 9742077
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,874 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.89 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CONDOR TRADER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC. · part of Victoria Ship Management

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,298 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

57.3

Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (−40%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

279 t

CO₂ emitted

874 t

Distance sailed

4,869 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

385 h

16 days, 4% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 64.5 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−19%)

52.8Ranks 368 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.3 kn · median 11.1 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 57% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−25%)

7.93Ranks 441 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU0%
Into the EU87%
At berth in the EU12%

Fuel burned laden

247 t

89% of all fuel; 12% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

103 t

11.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEA TRADER
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEA TRADER
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEA TRADER
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.9 kn	−22%	+19%	+29%	−32%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.8 kn	+36%	−10%	−55%	+19%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.2 kn	−27%	−9%	+303%	−51%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.0 kn	+22%	+1%	+6%	+102%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	−1.6 kn	+18%	+2%	+64%	+37%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,276	3,998	19,760	1,745	11.3	64.5	11.3	90%
2025	ES Maritime Co Ltd	1,276	3,998	19,760	1,745	11.3	64.5	11.3	90%
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	1,261	3,932	15,285	2,059	7.4	82.5	16.6	81%
2023	not published	2,068	6,457	34,137	3,054	11.2	60.6	13.9	84%
2022	not published	702	2,225	8,474	941	9.0	82.8	28.6	43%
2021	not published	540	1,686	7,963	727	11.0	67.8	14.2	77%
2019	not published	279	874	4,869	385	12.6	57.3	10.4	89%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	C
2025	ES Maritime Co Ltd	11.3	15.0	−25%	441 of 1,460	Korean Register	A
2024	VICTORIA SHIP MANAGEMENT INC.	16.6	16.7	−1%	631 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	13.9	16.2	−14%	514 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	28.6	16.1	+78%	1,106 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	14.2	16.7	−15%	504 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	10.4	17.3	−40%	206 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.