Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NORDIC HAWK

IMO: 9749491
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 70,884 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEROKEE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: V.Ships Norway AS · part of V.Ships

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 70,884 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

148.7 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.58

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−17%)

Average speed

12.1 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,734 t

CO₂ emitted

11,711 t

11,894 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,108 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,082 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 148.7 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+16%)

76.1Ranks 1,159 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 10.7 (+13%)

8.0Faster than 89% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.58 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−17%)

4.51Ranks 559 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU26%
Into the EU61%
At berth in the EU12%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,574 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NORDIC HAWK
Oil tanker median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC HAWK
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC HAWK
Oil tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+4%	+22%	+7%	+63%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.3 kn	−5%	−22%	−55%	−36%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+16%	+18%	+4%	−53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	−22%	−14%	+98%	+192%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+18%	+21%	−61%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+6%	+5%	−13%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−9%	+3%	+50%	+10%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	V.Ships Norway AS	3,734	11,711	25,108	2,082	12.1	148.7	6.58	–
2024	V.Ships Norway AS	3,362	10,514	23,470	2,283	10.3	143.2	4.04	–
2023	not published	7,779	24,299	51,733	4,101	12.6	150.4	6.32	–
2022	not published	6,412	20,043	49,525	3,998	12.4	129.5	13.34	–
2021	not published	4,162	13,063	25,058	2,240	11.2	166.1	4.57	–
2020	not published	9,024	28,156	64,251	5,872	10.9	140.4	6.55	–
2019	not published	9,796	30,611	73,688	6,661	11.1	132.9	6.23	–
2018	not published	7,183	22,488	49,007	5,038	9.7	146.6	5.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	V.Ships Norway AS	6.58	7.95	−17%	559 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	V.Ships Norway AS	4.04	8.06	−50%	116 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	6.32	8.44	−25%	507 of 1,797	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	13.34	8.51	+57%	1,467 of 1,961	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	4.57	8.86	−48%	156 of 1,789	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	6.55	9.03	−27%	466 of 1,870	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	6.23	8.83	−29%	472 of 1,919	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	5.66	8.86	−36%	382 of 1,779	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.