Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NORDIC HAWK

IMO: 9749491
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 70,884 t
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEDI 2.83 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHEROKEE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: V.Ships Norway AS · part of V.Ships

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 66,904 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

140

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (−27%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,024 t

CO₂ emitted

28,156 t

Distance sailed

64,251 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,872 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 149 kg/nm · median 129 (+16%)

76.1Ranks 1,159 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 10.7 (+13%)

8.0Faster than 89% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.58 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−17%)

4.51Ranks 559 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU48%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,518 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NORDIC HAWK
Oil tanker median

120.0130.0140.0150.0160.0170.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NORDIC HAWK
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NORDIC HAWK
Oil tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+4%	+22%	+7%	+63%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.3 kn	−5%	−22%	−55%	−36%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+16%	+18%	+4%	−53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	−22%	−14%	+98%	+192%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+18%	+21%	−61%	−30%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+6%	+5%	−13%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−9%	+3%	+50%	+10%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	V.Ships Norway AS	3,734	11,711	25,108	2,082	12.1	149	6.58	–
2024	V.Ships Norway AS	3,362	10,514	23,470	2,283	10.3	143	4.04	–
2023	not published	7,779	24,299	51,733	4,101	12.6	150	6.32	–
2022	not published	6,412	20,043	49,525	3,998	12.4	130	13.3	–
2021	not published	4,162	13,063	25,058	2,240	11.2	166	4.57	–
2020	not published	9,024	28,156	64,251	5,872	10.9	140	6.55	–
2019	not published	9,796	30,611	73,688	6,661	11.1	133	6.23	–
2018	not published	7,183	22,488	49,007	5,038	9.7	147	5.66	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	V.Ships Norway AS	6.58	7.95	−17%	559 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	V.Ships Norway AS	4.04	8.06	−50%	116 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	6.32	8.44	−25%	507 of 1,797	EMICERT	A
2022	not published	13.3	8.51	+57%	1,467 of 1,961	EMICERT	A
2021	not published	4.57	8.86	−48%	156 of 1,789	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	6.55	9.03	−27%	466 of 1,870	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	6.23	8.83	−29%	472 of 1,919	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	5.66	8.86	−36%	382 of 1,779	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.