Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

FAIRCHEM KATANA

IMO: 9749685
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,950 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,950 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

61.0 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.02

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−20%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,710 t

CO₂ emitted

5,374 t

5,458 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,030 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,390 h

100 days, 27% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 61.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−23%)

52.8Ranks 274 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 11.1 (+5%)

8.8Faster than 71% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.02 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−20%)

7.93Ranks 504 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU47%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU6%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,112 t).

Fuel burned laden

90%

10% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

5.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FAIRCHEM KATANA
Chemical tanker median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FAIRCHEM KATANA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FAIRCHEM KATANA
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+11%	+7%	+144%	+1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+5%	−1%	−18%	+15%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−17%	−12%	−62%	−30%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−10%	−7%	−5%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+20%	+16%	−14%	−3%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+2%	+7%	+121%	+51%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−11%	−16%	−36%	−14%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	1,710	5,374	28,030	2,390	11.7	61.0	12.02	90%
2024	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	629	1,980	11,493	943	12.2	54.8	11.95	82%
2023	not published	734	2,292	14,019	1,090	12.9	52.4	10.43	84%
2022	not published	2,307	7,292	36,623	2,994	12.2	63.0	14.84	84%
2021	not published	2,704	8,558	38,703	3,242	11.9	69.8	16.21	86%
2020	not published	2,634	8,362	45,147	3,671	12.3	58.3	16.79	73%
2019	not published	1,163	3,636	20,440	1,732	11.8	56.9	11.13	83%
2018	not published	2,042	6,401	31,928	2,561	12.5	64.0	13.01	60%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	12.02	15.04	−20%	504 of 1,460	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	11.95	16.73	−29%	394 of 1,274	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	10.43	16.23	−36%	250 of 1,314	ABS	C
2022	not published	14.84	16.06	−8%	610 of 1,409	ABS	C
2021	not published	16.21	16.69	−3%	647 of 1,343	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.79	16.16	+4%	698 of 1,312	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.13	17.32	−36%	258 of 1,321	ABS	C
2018	not published	13.01	17.14	−24%	391 of 1,294	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.