Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

NIKOLAY YEVGENOV

IMO: 9750725
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.72 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC3
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime Limited · part of Seapeak

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

372

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

12.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+14%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

137.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

30,516 t

CO₂ emitted

84,137 t

Distance sailed

81,933 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,312 h

221 days, 61% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 328 kg/nm · median 190 (+72%)

152Ranks 354 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

11.2Faster than 80% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+48%)

5.06Ranks 310 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,642 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NIKOLAY YEVGENOV
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NIKOLAY YEVGENOV
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

NIKOLAY YEVGENOV
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.3 kn	−8%	+9%	+9%	−2%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+1%	−12%	+8%	+1%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	+7%	−1%	−6%	−4%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+62%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	−13%	−8%	−41%	−18%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.9 kn	+2%	+36%	+126%	+4%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	28,779	77,074	87,627	5,709	15.3	328	–	–
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	28,468	72,154	80,030	6,144	13.0	356	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	26,216	69,221	74,390	5,004	14.9	352	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	25,985	71,564	78,836	4,891	16.1	330	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15,827	43,939	48,597	2,998	16.2	326	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	30,516	84,137	81,933	5,312	15.4	372	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	13,280	36,606	36,274	3,148	11.5	366	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	10.5	7.12	+48%	310 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	10.7	7.39	+45%	238 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10.6	9.10	+16%	226 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11.0	10.4	+6%	219 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10.0	10.5	−4%	138 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12.2	10.7	+14%	174 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.9	+8%	142 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.