Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GEORGIY USHAKOV

IMO: 9750749
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: PC3
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime Limited · part of Seapeak

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

325

LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (+4%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

116.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

27,612 t

CO₂ emitted

76,522 t

Distance sailed

84,872 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,689 h

237 days, 65% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 328 kg/nm · median 190 (+72%)

152Ranks 353 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 14.4 (+12%)

11.2Faster than 92% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.7 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+50%)

5.06Ranks 313 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,485 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GEORGIY USHAKOV
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GEORGIY USHAKOV
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

GEORGIY USHAKOV
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+3.2 kn	−6%	+18%	−17%	+1%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	+5%	−12%	+38%	+1%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+2%	+5%	−20%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−10%	−13%	+41%	−7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+1%	+4%	−14%	−0%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	+14%	+18%	+317%	+14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	25,362	67,841	77,391	4,803	16.1	328	–	–
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	32,674	83,353	93,725	7,278	12.9	349	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	22,560	59,112	67,929	4,428	15.3	332	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	27,612	76,522	84,872	5,689	14.9	325	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	21,844	60,519	60,150	3,908	15.4	363	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	24,983	68,828	69,680	4,635	15.0	359	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5,260	14,496	16,696	1,147	14.6	315	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	10.7	7.12	+50%	313 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024LNG	Seapeak Maritime Limited	10.5	7.39	+43%	234 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10.5	9.10	+15%	220 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10.8	10.4	+4%	208 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.5	10.5	+10%	168 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	11.5	10.7	+8%	160 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	10.1	10.9	−7%	105 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.