Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO SHIPPING ALPS

IMO: 9757864
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 96,705 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 102,698 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

259

Container median 174 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.87

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−58%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+15%)

Fuel per day at sea

98.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,959 t

CO₂ emitted

49,766 t

Distance sailed

61,575 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,899 h

162 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 261 kg/nm · median 177 (+48%)

78.8Ranks 1,744 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.6 kn · median 13.3 (+17%)

9.1Faster than 84% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−48%)

7.22Ranks 397 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU39%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,413 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COSCO SHIPPING ALPS
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

COSCO SHIPPING ALPS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

COSCO SHIPPING ALPS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	+0.7 kn	+4%	+9%	+37%	−48%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	−46%	+87%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−1%	−7%	−15%	+6%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	+8%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+1%	−3%	+22%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	10,950	34,071	41,943	2,695	15.6	261	8.40	–
2022	not published	7,656	23,890	30,557	2,052	14.9	251	16.1	–
2021	not published	14,781	46,097	56,112	3,809	14.7	263	8.57	–
2020	not published	17,718	55,224	66,337	4,226	15.7	267	8.11	–
2019	not published	15,959	49,766	61,575	3,899	15.8	259	7.87	–
2018	not published	12,906	40,236	50,269	3,066	16.4	257	7.58	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	8.40	16.3	−48%	397 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	16.1	19.1	−16%	770 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	8.57	17.9	−52%	210 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	8.11	17.6	−54%	237 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	7.87	18.9	−58%	182 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	7.58	20.2	−63%	106 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.