Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGY UNIVERSE

IMO: 9758844
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.36 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

242

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.09

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (−0%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

84.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,389 t

CO₂ emitted

56,574 t

Distance sailed

84,348 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,775 h

241 days, 66% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 207 kg/nm · median 190 (+9%)

152Ranks 242 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 14.4 (−8%)

11.2Faster than 25% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.70 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+22%)

5.06Ranks 254 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU42%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,001 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGY UNIVERSE
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ENERGY UNIVERSE
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.0

’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGY UNIVERSE
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’202020’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	−51%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	−8%	−19%	−76%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	+12%	+9%	+244%	+38%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+0.6 kn	−2%	+2%	−39%	+3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.	2,038	5,505	9,862	750	13.2	207	–	–
2024LNG	MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.	4,469	11,960	20,072	1,556	12.9	223	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	20,389	56,574	84,348	5,775	14.6	242	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5,314	14,782	24,519	1,637	15.0	217	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8,852	24,520	40,137	2,790	14.4	221	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.	8.70	7.12	+22%	254 of 386	ClassNK	C
2024LNG	MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9.09	9.10	−0%	177 of 355	ClassNK	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.61	10.4	−36%	66 of 379	ClassNK	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6.44	10.7	−40%	22 of 267	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.