Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.your view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 7 |
| CO₂ emitted | 160 kt+994.3% |
| Fuel per mile | 202 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.1 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 5 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.6.2 (−13% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | 7 | 6.2 | −13% | 202 | 14.1 | 2,502 | 2.3% | 5 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD. | ClassNK (7) | 0% | 57% | 100% | 0% |
MOL LNG TRANSPORT CO., LTD.: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AL WAKRAH | 9086746 | LNG carrier | 14.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +106% | 14.3 | 21,453 t | €567k |
| ENERGY UNIVERSELNG | 9758844 | LNG carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +22% | 13.2 | 5,505 t | €149k |
| AL WAJBAHLNG | 9085625 | LNG carrier | 6.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −13% | 14.1 | 8,924 t | €239k |
| ENERGY INNOVATORLNG | 9758832 | LNG carrier | 6.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −13% | 15.5 | 22,001 t | €592k |
| SOHSHU MARULNG | 9791212 | LNG carrier | 6.2 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −13% | 13.0 | 31,732 t | €844k |
| NOHSHU MARULNG | 9796781 | LNG carrier | 5.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −22% | 14.9 | 28,440 t | €776k |
30 of 7 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.