Navalyze

Navalyze · Passenger · Ship

MSC BELLISSIMA

IMO
9760524
Type
Passenger ship
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.54 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
459
Passenger median 277 kg/nm (+66%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
283
g CO₂/pax·nm · Passenger median 589 (−52%)
Average speed
16.4 kn
Passenger median 12.9 kn (+27%)
Fuel per day at sea
180.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
30,510 t
CO₂ emitted
95,070 t
Distance sailed
66,497 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,047 h
169 days, 46% of the year

Within the passenger fleet, 2023

Set against all 202 passenger ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 428 kg/nm · median 270 (+58%)
76.6Ranks 177 of 202, lowest first455
Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 13.7 (+7%)
10.4Faster than 69% of passenger ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 416 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 625 (−34%)
330Ranks 52 of 202, lowest first1,931
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Passenger medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports83%
  • From the EU1%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU16%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
15,059 t
15.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Passenger median is the middle ship of all passenger ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC BELLISSIMA
  • Passenger median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC BELLISSIMA
  • Passenger median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • MSC BELLISSIMA
  • Passenger median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2023−0.8 kn−11%−15%−52%+1%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2022−0.9 kn+5%−1%−19%+46%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2023not published11,02434,39625,7721,74914.7428––
2022not published25,83080,52753,7833,46315.5480––
2019not published30,51095,07066,4974,04716.4459––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmPassenger medianvs PassengerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published416625−34%52 of 202Bureau VeritasC
2022not published412831−50%12 of 187Bureau VeritasC
2019not published283589−52%6 of 177Bureau VeritasC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Passenger ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's passenger ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.