Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE TRIUMPH

IMO: 9769271
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 117,199 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TRIUMPH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 117,199 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

250.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.64

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−59%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

66.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,135 t

CO₂ emitted

37,724 t

38,320 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

48,476 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,391 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 250.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+41%)

78.8Ranks 1,654 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−59%)

7.22Ranks 144 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU70%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (19,039 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ONE TRIUMPH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TRIUMPH
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TRIUMPH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	−6%	−23%	+55%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+13%	+20%	−17%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	+60%	+15%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−14%	−12%	−44%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.3 kn	+3%	−19%	−29%	+4%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+6%	+10%	−1%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+6%	+6%	+1%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	12,135	37,724	48,476	4,391	11.0	250.3	6.64	–
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	8,280	25,860	31,225	2,304	13.6	265.2	–	–
2023	not published	8,796	27,516	37,602	2,944	12.8	233.9	6.86	–
2022	not published	5,763	18,046	23,479	1,872	12.5	245.4	5.97	–
2021	not published	12,013	37,621	42,002	3,415	12.3	286.0	5.83	–
2020	not published	16,380	51,659	59,102	3,781	15.6	277.1	5.61	–
2019	not published	15,552	48,450	59,671	3,939	15.1	260.6	5.57	–
2018	not published	14,528	45,327	59,258	3,911	15.2	245.2	6.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	6.64	16.30	−59%	144 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	6.86	19.40	−65%	141 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	5.97	19.13	−69%	35 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	5.83	17.90	−67%	41 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	5.61	17.58	−68%	23 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	5.57	18.88	−70%	18 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	6.90	20.22	−66%	51 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.