Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE TRIUMPH

IMO: 9769271
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 117,199 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TRIUMPH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 145,772 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

261

Container median 174 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.57

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−70%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,552 t

CO₂ emitted

48,450 t

Distance sailed

59,671 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,939 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 250 kg/nm · median 177 (+41%)

78.8Ranks 1,654 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 13.3 (−17%)

9.1Faster than 22% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−59%)

7.22Ranks 144 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU38%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,352 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE TRIUMPH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TRIUMPH
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TRIUMPH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	−6%	−23%	+55%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	+13%	+20%	−17%	–	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	−5%	−3%	+60%	+15%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−14%	−12%	−44%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.3 kn	+3%	−19%	−29%	+4%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+6%	+10%	−1%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+6%	+6%	+1%	−19%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	12,135	37,724	48,476	4,391	11.0	250	6.64	–
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	8,280	25,860	31,225	2,304	13.6	265	–	–
2023	not published	8,796	27,516	37,602	2,944	12.8	234	6.86	–
2022	not published	5,763	18,046	23,479	1,872	12.5	245	5.97	–
2021	not published	12,013	37,621	42,002	3,415	12.3	286	5.83	–
2020	not published	16,380	51,659	59,102	3,781	15.6	277	5.61	–
2019	not published	15,552	48,450	59,671	3,939	15.1	261	5.57	–
2018	not published	14,528	45,327	59,258	3,911	15.2	245	6.90	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	6.64	16.3	−59%	144 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	6.86	19.4	−65%	141 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	5.97	19.1	−69%	35 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	5.83	17.9	−67%	41 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	5.61	17.6	−68%	23 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	5.57	18.9	−70%	18 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	6.90	20.2	−66%	51 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.