Navalyze · Container · Ship

ONE TRUST

IMO: 9769283
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 95,210 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.42 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MOL TRUST

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 148,248 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

243

Container median 174 kg/nm (+39%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

5.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−73%)

Average speed

16.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,497 t

CO₂ emitted

45,347 t

Distance sailed

59,743 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,702 h

154 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 251 kg/nm · median 177 (+42%)

78.8Ranks 1,658 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 50% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.18 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−50%)

7.22Ranks 355 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU37%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

14,106 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,279 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ONE TRUST
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ONE TRUST
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ONE TRUST
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+2%	+10%	+31%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.8 kn	+4%	−9%	−24%	–	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−18%	−21%	+60%	−26%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−0%	+3%	−33%	+45%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.8 kn	+0%	−11%	−24%	+3%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+18%	+18%	+6%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−15%	−15%	+11%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	12,776	39,692	50,965	3,825	13.3	251	8.18	98%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	9,557	29,855	38,869	3,156	12.3	246	–	98%
2023	not published	12,055	37,667	51,153	3,634	14.1	236	6.33	98%
2022	not published	9,141	28,583	31,966	2,171	14.7	286	8.60	96%
2021	not published	13,698	43,278	47,719	3,346	14.3	287	5.95	98%
2020	not published	18,039	56,939	63,077	3,914	16.1	286	5.79	98%
2019	not published	14,497	45,347	59,743	3,702	16.1	243	5.12	97%
2018	not published	15,396	48,149	53,887	3,344	16.1	286	6.87	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	8.18	16.3	−50%	355 of 2,208	ClassNK	A+C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	6.33	19.4	−67%	91 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	8.60	19.1	−55%	237 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	5.95	17.9	−67%	53 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	5.79	17.6	−67%	41 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	5.12	18.9	−73%	5 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	6.87	20.2	−66%	49 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.