Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MAGDALA

IMO
9770921
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Bahamas
Port of registry
Nassau, Bahamas
Technical efficiency
EEDI 3.07 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
200
LNG carrier median 252 kg/nm (−21%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
5.70
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.4 (−45%)
Average speed
14.8 kn
LNG carrier median 14.1 kn (+5%)
Fuel per day at sea
70.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,733 t
CO₂ emitted
35,742 t
Distance sailed
63,710 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,313 h
180 days, 49% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 219 kg/nm · median 205 (+7%)
148Ranks 184 of 312, lowest first328
Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.6 (+2%)
11.0Faster than 59% of LNG carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.07 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (−4%)
4.54Ranks 149 of 312, lowest first17.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU47%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
7,703 t
61% of all fuel; 40% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
715 t
2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MAGDALA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MAGDALA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • MAGDALA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024−0.4 kn−0%−3%−19%−6%0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.5 kn+10%+14%−42%+32%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−0.3 kn−10%−12%+98%−53%Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.8 kn−5%−9%+55%+32%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.6 kn+1%−3%−1%+69%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019−0.6 kn+0%−3%+36%−14%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024LNGShell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited6,51918,18229,7201,99814.9219–62%
2023LNG / alt.not published8,06122,48736,7192,40315.3220––
2022LNG / alt.not published12,73335,74263,7104,31314.8200–61%
2021LNG / alt.not published7,12019,92232,0972,12415.1222–41%
2020LNG / alt.not published4,82413,50420,7571,30815.9232–51%
2019LNG / alt.not published4,81213,41021,0041,27116.5229–75%
2018LNG / alt.not published3,5139,82715,39790017.1228–66%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024LNGShell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited7.077.39−4%149 of 312Lloyd's RegisterB
2023LNG / alt.not published7.549.10−17%132 of 355Lloyd's RegisterB
2022LNG / alt.not published5.7010.4−45%30 of 379Lloyd's RegisterB
2021LNG / alt.not published12.110.5+16%182 of 289Lloyd's RegisterB
2020LNG / alt.not published9.2310.7−14%90 of 267Lloyd's RegisterB
2019LNG / alt.not published5.4710.9−50%14 of 248Lloyd's RegisterB
2018LNG / alt.not published6.3610.9−42%25 of 197Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.