Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG SCHNEEWEISSCHEN

IMO: 9771913
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 4.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd · part of MOL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

273

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+21%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

96.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,835 t

CO₂ emitted

53,114 t

Distance sailed

72,721 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,944 h

206 days, 56% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 197 kg/nm · median 190 (+4%)

152Ranks 219 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 14.4 (−1%)

11.2Faster than 46% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 5.93 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (−17%)

5.06Ranks 129 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU55%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

919 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG SCHNEEWEISSCHEN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG SCHNEEWEISSCHEN
LNG carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG SCHNEEWEISSCHEN
LNG carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.1 kn	−5%	−17%	+34%	−24%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	−24%	−16%	−3%	−29%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+10%	+11%	+83%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	+7%	−10%	+19%	−25%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+24%	+32%	−1%	+93%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+7.0 kn	−16%	+49%	+57%	–	7.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.0 kn	+0%	−30%	+320%	–	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-yearLNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	9,006	20,686	43,635	2,780	15.7	206	–	–
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	18,662	46,961	94,581	6,641	14.2	197	–	–
2024LNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	14,653	36,923	70,812	4,347	16.3	207	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	19,835	53,114	72,721	4,944	14.7	273	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9,905	28,575	39,774	2,736	14.5	249	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	7,821	22,276	33,538	1,947	17.2	233	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6,352	17,520	33,753	2,091	16.1	188	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	4,832	13,388	21,523	2,376	9.1	225	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	1,145	3,169	5,122	391	13.1	224	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-yearLNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	5.93	7.12	−17%	129 of 386	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024LNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	7.79	7.39	+5%	166 of 312	DNV	A+B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.0	9.10	+21%	240 of 355	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	8.52	10.4	−18%	141 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.3	10.5	+8%	160 of 289	DNV	A+B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	5.86	10.7	−45%	12 of 267	DNV	A+B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.