Navalyze · Container · Ship

VAYENGA MAERSK

IMO: 9775751
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 29,949 t
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEDI 12.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,949 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

114.3 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−27%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,073 t

CO₂ emitted

15,785 t

16,034 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

44,366 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,248 h

135 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 114.3 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−35%)

78.8Ranks 656 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 55% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.88 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−27%)

7.22Ranks 782 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports18%
From the EU64%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU5%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (9,598 t).

Fuel burned laden

95%

5% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VAYENGA MAERSK
Container median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VAYENGA MAERSK
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VAYENGA MAERSK
Container median

0.010.020.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.7 kn	−1%	+13%	−30%	−27%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+2,028%	+1,969%	−4%	–	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2,028%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−96%	−96%	−8%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile down 96%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+24%	+13%	+1%	−67%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+3%	+2%	−1%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.1 kn	+1%	−6%	−0%	−39%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−6%	−3%	+123%	−20%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	5,073	15,785	44,366	3,248	13.7	114.3	11.88	95%
2024	Maersk A/S	7,291	21,768	63,449	5,281	12.0	114.9	16.27	92%
2023	not published	357	1,141	66,081	5,279	12.5	5.4	0.90	60%
2022LNG	not published	8,962	5,817	71,803	5,747	12.5	124.8	3.36	97%
2021LNG	not published	7,203	19,267	71,336	5,201	13.7	101.0	10.29	–
2020	not published	7,025	21,875	71,914	5,198	13.8	97.7	12.23	100%
2019	not published	6,988	21,770	71,922	4,842	14.9	97.2	20.20	100%
2018	not published	3,323	10,472	32,231	2,232	14.4	103.1	25.20	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	11.88	16.30	−27%	782 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	16.27	17.52	−7%	908 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	C
2022LNG	not published	3.36	19.13	−82%	2 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021LNG	not published	10.29	17.90	−43%	344 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	12.23	17.58	−30%	525 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	20.20	18.88	+7%	976 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	25.20	20.22	+25%	1,045 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.