Navalyze · Container · Ship

VENTA MAERSK

IMO: 9775763
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 19,470 t
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEDI 13.63 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,470 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.88

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−9%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,558 t

CO₂ emitted

17,173 t

17,446 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

59,275 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,768 h

199 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−47%)

78.8Ranks 457 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 13.3 (−7%)

9.1Faster than 36% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.88 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−9%)

7.22Ranks 1,000 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports85%
From the EU2%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU7%

77% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (13,154 t).

Fuel burned laden

92%

8% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VENTA MAERSK
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VENTA MAERSK
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VENTA MAERSK
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−10%	−4%	+3%	−22%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+14%	+17%	+2%	+12%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+7%	+9%	−1%	+13%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−1%	−6%	−12%	−4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	−4%	−10%	−5%	+4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−5%	−10%	−4%	−23%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−17%	−17%	+163%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	5,558	17,173	59,275	4,768	12.4	93.8	14.88	92%
2024LNG	Maersk A/S	5,973	17,572	57,542	4,894	11.8	103.8	19.09	92%
2023	not published	5,130	15,978	56,274	4,901	11.5	91.2	16.97	86%
2022	not published	4,878	15,191	57,069	5,075	11.2	85.5	14.99	92%
2021	not published	5,627	17,522	64,928	5,480	11.8	86.7	15.57	–
2020	not published	6,133	19,097	68,064	5,379	12.7	90.1	14.94	100%
2019	not published	6,789	21,161	71,270	5,356	13.3	95.3	19.29	100%
2018	not published	3,105	9,786	27,132	2,025	13.4	114.5	20.37	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	14.88	16.30	−9%	1,000 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024LNG	Maersk A/S	19.09	17.52	+9%	1,082 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	16.97	19.40	−13%	826 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	14.99	19.13	−22%	697 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	15.57	17.90	−13%	753 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	14.94	17.58	−15%	731 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	19.29	18.88	+2%	926 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	20.37	20.22	+1%	858 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.