Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY

IMO: 9776418
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 143,562 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valetta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 175,038 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

352

Container median 182 kg/nm (+93%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−69%)

Average speed

18.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+34%)

Fuel per day at sea

155.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

22,398 t

CO₂ emitted

69,892 t

Distance sailed

63,684 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,448 h

144 days, 39% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 315 kg/nm · median 177 (+78%)

78.8Ranks 2,051 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.85 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−58%)

7.22Ranks 170 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU33%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,299 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	−2%	−12%	−18%	−8%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.1 kn	+10%	+26%	+65%	+19%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−11%	−8%	−3%	+53%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	−13%	−21%	−21%	−38%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+2%	−3%	+16%	+15%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	+16%	+12%	+27%	+17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	−9%	−18%	−24%	−22%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	23,320	72,718	73,946	4,972	14.9	315	6.85	97%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	28,911	90,102	89,943	5,447	16.5	321	7.44	98%
2023	not published	15,991	49,870	54,600	3,790	14.4	293	6.27	96%
2022	not published	18,546	57,979	56,555	4,060	13.9	328	4.09	96%
2021	not published	26,945	84,260	71,805	4,671	15.4	375	6.55	96%
2020	not published	22,927	71,911	62,025	3,863	16.1	370	5.70	–
2019	not published	15,550	48,496	48,648	2,927	16.6	320	4.89	98%
2018	not published	22,398	69,892	63,684	3,448	18.5	352	6.27	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	6.85	16.3	−58%	170 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	7.44	17.5	−58%	211 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	6.27	19.4	−68%	87 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	4.09	19.1	−79%	4 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	6.55	17.9	−63%	103 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	5.70	17.6	−68%	31 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	4.89	18.9	−74%	4 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	6.27	20.2	−69%	15 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.